Showing posts with label Walsingham. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Walsingham. Show all posts

Saturday, 22 July 2023

The Langham Martyrs

The publication of William Tyndale’s New Testament in 1526 accelerated the spread of Protestantism from the Continent. Printed abroad and smuggled into Catholic England, the body of translations popularly called the Tyndale Bible was the first English Bible to be mass produced: there were probably 16,000 copies in England by 1536.

Not everyone was receptive to the changes sweeping across the country. In November that year, John Smyth of Wighton was returning home from London when he happened to meet on the road one Ralph Rogerson, a yeoman farmer employed by Walsingham Priory as a ‘singing man’ or lay chorister.

The two of them continued their journey together, and as they did so bemoaned the cruelties and injustices being perpetrated in the name of religion. Two years earlier Henry VIII, by means of the first Act of Supremacy, had rejected Rome and founded the Church of England, appointing himself its supreme head; yet in 1521 he had been declared ‘Defender of the Faith’ by Pope Leo X in respect of a pamphlet he had published accusing Martin Luther, the seminal figure of the Protestant movement, of heresy.

In 1544, ten years after the first Act of Supremacy, Parliament sarcastically bestowed this selfsame title on its renegade sovereign.

The Act had had a long gestation. Henry’s first wife, Catherine of Aragon, had been his late brother’s wife and it had needed a special dispensation from Pope Julius II to allow the wedding to take place. She failed to provide him with a son and heir; in the mean time he had fallen in love with Anne Boleyn. He wanted to marry her, but Pope Clement VII refused to annul the existing marriage.

Henry VIII, from a portrait by Hans Holbein

The Catholic Church wielded great power in England. It was immensely wealthy and enjoyed privileges denied to the laity. It was also seen as corrupt doctrinally, financially and morally. Such practices as simony did not sit well with those who yearned to go back to a simpler and more faithful adherence to scripture – before Tyndale, personal exposure to the Bible outside the priesthood had been possible only for the minority who could read Latin. The Church had also become tainted by stories of sexual misconduct in religious houses.

Henry’s rejection of Rome was expedient on three levels. He could see the way the Protestant wind was blowing; the wealth of the Church made a tempting target for a monarch who always wanted more; and of course, once free of the Pope’s intransigence, he could marry whomever he pleased.

His policies, as well as other grievances, led in October 1536 to the Lincolnshire Rising, when religious conservatives rioted against the king’s commissioners in protest at the suppression of the monasteries and the looting of their treasures.

Plaque commemorating the Lincolnshire Rising, at St James’s Church, Louth
Image credit: Sjwells53; licence

It was brutally put down, but was followed almost immediately by a far more serious rebellion in Yorkshire involving thirty thousand men at arms. This, known as the Pilgrimage of Grace, was likewise quashed and ended in the execution of over two hundred and twenty men.

The unrest was not restricted to Yorkshire and Lincolnshire. It should be understood that the gentry were participating, sometimes zealously, in the dismantling of the Catholic Church in this country and were often made gifts of its land. Together with long-held, simmering economic resentments and the fact that north Norfolk was especially conservative in matters of religion, the threat to Walsingham Priory was provocative in the extreme. Even after 1534 the shrine of Our Lady continued to attract pilgrims, and it had a special place in local people’s hearts.

On that November day in 1536, as John Smyth and Ralph Rogerson decried at length what was going on, they inflamed one another to the point where Smyth is said to have proposed an insurrection against ‘great men’ with himself as its leader – though later he would deny everything. The chief object was to spare Walsingham the fate of other religious houses that had been or were in the process of being broken up.

The proposal was as naive as it was reckless. The conspirators were to seize some of the more overbearing landowners together with their land, and so bring their grievances before the king.

The Walsingham Conspiracy, as it became known, never got beyond the planning stage. Someone reported it to Sir John Heydon of Baconsthorpe, who at once contacted Richard Gresham in London and Sir Roger Townshend at East Raynham. About 25 conspirators were arrested, all from north Norfolk. Three were from Langham: Thomas Manne, a carpenter; John Sellers, a tailor; and none other than the vicar, John Grigby or Grigbie.

Smyth and Rogerson, the original conspirators, escaped with their lives. So did Grigby – how, it is not known. Manne and Sellers were among the eleven men condemned to death. To broadcast the authorities’ salutary message, the executions were carried out at four different places: Lynn, Walsingham, Norwich and Yarmouth. Manne was executed at Norwich on 26 May 1537; Sellers followed him two days later, at Yarmouth.

The mode of execution, hanging, drawing and quartering, was exceptionally barbarous. The condemned man was dragged through the streets behind a horse, with or without the support of an old door or something of that sort. A crowd of spectators would follow, while more would be waiting at the gallows. The convict was hanged but taken down half-alive and, still conscious, emasculated. His abdomen was then slit open and his intestines drawn out. If by this time he had not succumbed to death he certainly did so next, when he was beheaded. Finally his body was ‘quartered’ – cut into four, boiled, and hung up in sundry public places to drive the lesson home.


The executions at Walsingham were performed just outside the town, at a place now called ‘Martyrs’ Field’, in the angle formed by the junction of Egmere Road with Station Road. Today it is just a nondescript bit of pasture populated by rabbits. There is nothing there to commemorate its grisly past, nor to remind us of the tumult that birthed the Church of England.


Saturday, 8 July 2023

The Langham Madonna

Long before the Norman Conquest, Langham was divided into two parishes: Langham Magna to the east (also called Langham St Andrew, Langham Episcopi and Bishop’s Langham) and Langham Parva to the west (also called Langham St Mary and Little Langham), each with its own church – St Andrew’s being of course in Langham Magna and St Mary’s in Langham Parva.
St Mary’s was situated at the fork of the Binham and Cockthorpe roads. It had stood there for at least five centuries but disappeared between 1535, when Henry VIII ordered a catalogue to be made of all church property, and 1552, when a national inventory of church goods was taken. The dedication to St Mary was folded in with St Andrew’s, which is why our parish church now has a double dedication. No burials have yet been found at the site, nor any other archaeological remains.

A survey of 1602 says this of Langham Parva: ‘The Church there is whollie ruynated and p’faned long since, by Mr. Calthorp, sometyme Lord and Patrone thereof, there are no p’rishners dwelling in the said towne.’ In 1743 the church of St Mary was described as ‘demolished beyond the memory of man’.

In the 16th century there was a movement throughout much of northern Europe for rejection of papal authority. The Catholic Church was seen as idolatrous and corrupt. Protestantism was on the rise; in England this took shape in the first Act of Supremacy of 1534, when Henry VIII rejected Rome and founded the Church of England, with himself as its head. During the next five years the Dissolution of the Monasteries would see church property being seized and much of it distributed to Henry’s allies and cronies among the gentry.

In July 1538 Prior Vowell of Walsingham Priory acquiesced in its demolition and helped the king’s commissioners to remove its treasures, notably the figure of Our Lady. For this he received an annual pension of £100, a hefty sum in those days. The site was sold to one Thomas Sidney for £90. As to what happened to the figure, there is considerable confusion. Some accounts have it taken to London to be burnt, while others say it remained in Norfolk and was destroyed there.

Before the Reformation Walsingham was one of the most revered places in the Catholic world, drawing pilgrims from far and wide, as indeed it does to this day. Its desecration is bewailed in the contemporaneous ‘Lament for the Priory of Walsingham’:

In the wrackes of Walsingam
Whom should I chuse
But the Queene of Walsingam
To be guide to my muse?

Then, thou Prince of Walsingam
Graunt me to frame
Bitter plaintes to rewe thy wronge
Bitter wo for thy name.

Bitter was it, oh to see
The sely [innocent] sheepe
Murdred by the raveninge wolves
While the sheepharde did sleep.

Bitter was it, oh, to viewe
The sacred vyne
Whiles the gardiners plaied [plaited] all close
Rooted up by the swine.

Bitter, bitter oh to behoulde
The grasse to growe
Where the walles of Walsingam
So stately did shewe.

Such were the worth of Walsingam
While she did stand
Such are the wrackes as now do shewe
Of that so holy lande.

Levell, levell with the ground
The Towres doe lye
Which with their golden, glitt’ring tops
Pearsed oute to the skye.

Where weare gates noe gates are nowe,
The waies [pathways] unknowen,
Where the presse [crowd] of freares [friars] did passe
While her fame far was blowen [trumpeted].

Oules [owls] do scrike where the sweetest himnes
Lately wear songe,
Toades and serpents hold their dennes
Where the palmers did throng.

Weep, weep O Walsingam,
Whose dayes are nightes,
Blessings turned to blasphemies,
Holy deedes to dispites [crimes].

Sinne is where our Ladye sate,
Heaven turned is to helle;
Sathan sitte where our Lord did swaye,
Walsingam, oh, farewell!

            — Anonymous

It is not unusual for two churches to be near one another in Norfolk, as at Wiveton and Cley, so what happened to St Mary’s? A possible clue is in the name.

Thanks to Henry’s largesse to the ruling class, much of it was quick to welcome the new Protestant order. Much of the peasantry, however, clung to the comfort of the old religion and its rituals. This was especially true in the countryside, and especially so in the remote countryside of north Norfolk. Matters were not helped in many hearts by a deep-seated resentment of the gentry, a phantom of the hatred of the Anglo-Saxons for their Norman overlords; many of the contemporary gentry could trace their lineage back to France.

Michael Medlar, in his study (pdf) of early sixteenth century Langham wills, finds that bequests were made by villagers to ‘Our Lady of Tofte’. One in particular, the largest, of £45 in land and goods, was made by one Oliver Dawbeney on 27 October 1532, two years before the first Act of Supremacy. Barendina Smedley speculates that there may have been a figure of the Virgin Mary venerated in St Mary’s named Our Lady of Tofte, though she leans more to the idea that there was a now-vanished chapel for the figure next to the present north door of St Andrew’s.

The origin of the name is clouded in mystery and may have a connection with the hamlet of Toftrees, south of Fakenham, which in the past was called ‘Tofte’ or ‘Toftes’.

Stephanie A Mann notes that a wooden statuette of the Virgin and Child at the Victoria and Albert Museum, dated to about 1220-30 and still bearing traces of paint, goes under the name of ‘The Langham Madonna’.
The Walsingham Seal

She also notes that, while the Langham Madonna is said (on no evident authority) to have come from Langham in Essex, it bears a close resemblance to the figure in the Walsingham Seal; and she speculates that Our Lady of Walsingham may have been spirited away to a local but out-of-the-way site of Marian worship – St Mary’s, Langham, Norfolk: for the Calthorpes of Langham Hall (not the Hall by the crossroads, but an earlier one, now lost) were known to be recusants, and the vicar of Langham, John Grigby, was arrested for his part in a conspiracy which tried to resist the dissolution of Walsingham Priory.

We are unlikely ever to know what happened. Could it really be that the ‘ruynation’ of St Mary’s, so expeditiously carried out by ‘Mr. Calthorp, sometyme Lord and Patrone thereof’, included the further spiriting away of that iconic artefact of ‘popery’? And could it be that the arrest of the conspirators persuaded Mr Calthorpe thus to distance himself – and his dangerous reputation as a recusant – from John Grigby and so protect his person, his family and his lands from men of even higher rank and influence?